LatAm countries back Ecuador in Assange case

Latin American countries voiced support Thursday for Ecuador's latest decision to grant political asylum to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, a move that triggered a diplomatic row between Quito and London.

The members of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA) -- Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador and three Caribbean island nations -- said in a statement that they "strongly object" to the British threat of raiding Ecuador's embassy in London to seize Assange, who has taken refuge there since June 19.

The statement said Britain would violate the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and face "grave consequences if the threats are carried out." The ALBA also expressed its "steadfast solidarity" with Ecuador, which granted political asylum to Assange on Thursday.

Jorge Tarud, president of the Chamber of Deputies Foreign Relations Committee in the Chilean Congress, on Thursday asked the Chilean government to give full support to Ecuador on the issue. Uruguayan Foreign Minister Luis Almagro also urged Britain to "respect the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, and to guarantee the privileges, inviolability and immunity of Ecuador's embassy." Read more >>

Global Corporations Sue Governments in Secret Courts -- Guess Who Usually Wins

In a world turned upside down, when governments forbid companies from dumping toxic waste or warn their citizens of the dangers of tobacco, large multinational corporations sue them in secret courts, where unelected judges, acting without juries, usually force the governments to cease their efforts and pay large fines to the corporations. It sounds like the voiceover for the trailer of a dystopian science fiction movie. But this is not fiction, science or otherwise; this is the reality of International Law in the early 21st century.

According to a recent report released by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), at the end of 2011 there were at least 450 active lawsuits brought against governments by companies invoking clauses in bilateral investment treaties (BITs). These are only the known cases; most are kept secret. BITs are treaties that establish the conditions for investment by companies of one country in another nation, and were often forced upon small countries by large countries at the behest of corporations seeking to avoid regulations wherever they do business.

Although BITs have been around for years, it was only after the turn of the century that corporations started ramping up their use of them to frustrate regulations they don’t like. In 1999, the total number of known BIT suits exceeded 100 for the first time, and has steadily increased since, usually to the detriment of the nations being sued. Last year, for example, Ecuador was forced to pay fines of $78 million to U.S. oil company Chevron, which claimed the country’s efforts to protect the Amazon from pollution have negatively affected business. More...