NBC’s ratings woes aren’t just limited to weekday mornings, evenings and late night. The network’s Sunday morning flagship Meet the Press–the longest-running show on network television, as its announcer reminds the audience every week–has recently fallen to a 21-year low. And as of the past few weeks, the show has come in third place on Sunday morning, trailing CBS’ Face the Nation and ABC’s This Week.
More than four years ago, the Los Angeles Times warned that the perennial “king of Sunday morning TV news talk shows could soon lose its crown,” a prediction that has been borne out in the years since. According to Nielsen data, Meet the Press is averaging its smallest total viewer audience (2.913 million) in 21 years and smallest 25-54 demo performance (854,000) in more than 21 years, dating back to the 1991-1992 season.
CBS’ Face the Nation is the clear winner, taking the number one spot away from Meet The Press for the first time in 15 years for total viewers and in 18 years for the 25-54 demo. The show even managed to maintain its lead last week when CBS was blocked from three major markets–New York, Los Angeles and Dallas–due to an ongoing dispute with Time Warner Cable. And this summer, on June 28th and August 4th, ABC’s This Week jumped to number two in total viewers and the demo, pushing Meet The Press to third place, a position in hasn’t seen in years. Read more >>
Showing posts with label Los Angeles Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Los Angeles Times. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Who helped corporate rich get richer? You did
Image via Wikipedia
In the banking industry in 2009, the rich got richer -- which has, of course, infuriated much of the nation.
But that same basic idea, mostly minus the public infuriation factor, is playing out across the business world.
The Great Recession has killed untold numbers of small firms, many of which were unable to line up financing to keep their operations afloat.
But money is no problem at all for corporate America. And the biggest businesses don't need banks, at least not for loans. As the credit crisis has eased, they've been able to turn to the welcoming arms of the bond market.
Recessions always are about the weak falling away while the strong survive. But this time around, the credit crunch has remained so severe for smaller firms that the advantage has been magnified for the major companies that have unfettered access to cash via bond sales.
Issuance of high-quality (i.e., investment-grade) bonds reached a record $2.83 trillion worldwide last year, a stunning 38% jump from 2008, according to data tracker Dealogic. Although governments were heavy borrowers, about half of that total raised was by big-name companies.
Who helped make the corporate rich even richer? You did -- if you're one of many Americans who pumped your savings into bond mutual funds. An unprecedented $375 billion poured into bond funds in 2009, providing a significant chunk of the capital that then flowed into newly issued bonds from companies such as General Electric Co., Pfizer Inc. and Dow Chemical Co.
And like any symbiotic relationship, this one has no good reason to end. While many investors now shun the stock market, their hunger for income may keep demand for corporate bonds strong in 2010 and beyond.
A bond is a promise to pay -- first, to pay a rate of interest each year, and second, to repay the investor's principal when the bond matures on a set date, if not before. Understandably, after the financial markets' crash of 2008, a promise to pay sounds a lot better to shell-shocked investors than taking a flier on a stock.
For a company like GE or Pfizer, bonds offer a way to raise large sums of cash at set interest rates. Those rates were declining for much of 2009 as fear subsided in financial markets and as investors bid aggressively for fixed-income securities.
It isn't just the Fortune 500 that can borrow through bonds, but this isn't a market that's open to the millions of small firms that have been the most starved for credit over the last 18 months.
Last year, the massive sums raised from corporate bond sales allowed some companies to pay off bank loans or bonds previously issued at higher interest rates. Others used the money to finance takeovers. And some firms just built up their cash reserves to bolster their finances.
The amount of cash on the balance sheets of the industrial companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index soared to a record $820 billion as of Sept. 30 from $647 billion a year earlier, according to S&P.
Because cash pays nothing, big companies should be feeling pressure to put those dollars to more productive use -- say, by expanding.
But we live in a still-struggling global economy that already has too much vacant office space and too many idled factories. "Who needs more capital goods or structures with 15% excess capacity lurking in most economies?" said Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, N.Y.
Likewise, many big companies believe they have no need for additional workers, which is why double-digit unemployment has become the black cloud over the economic recovery of the last six months.
Yet even in the best of times, the Fortune 500 aren't engines of job growth in the U.S. "Almost all of the new jobs and investment in any economy come from small companies morphing into larger ones," Weinberg notes. "If they get squeezed, the economy loses its dynamism."
That's one of the great long-term risks the U.S. faces from the corporate-rich-get-richer syndrome that bond investors are abetting. If capital is being misallocated -- meaning, if its most productive use would be with smaller companies, except that they can't get into the bond market and they can't get loans from banks -- the economy can't live up to its true potential.
While corporate titans benefited from the bond market's largess last year, many also have been reaping the rewards of the ruthless drive to reduce head count and slash other costs. Even modest growth in sales now is falling directly to the bottom line.
The result: Fourth-quarter earnings reports from the S&P 500 index companies are coming in far above Wall Street analysts' expectations. Of the 220 companies in the index that have reported results so far, 78% have beaten estimates, according to data firm Thomson Reuters. And on average, earnings have been 17% above expectations -- a "surprise" factor that, if it holds up, would be the highest for any quarter since Thomson Reuters began tracking data in 1994.
It could be that analysts, more than usual, are lowballing their estimates to make it easier for companies to post pleasant surprises. Still, there's no question that earnings have improved dramatically for the biggest firms.
That profit rebound should be good news for stock prices, and it was for much of the last 10 months. But the equity market has hit an air pocket over the last two weeks.
On Friday, the Dow Jones industrial average lost 53.13 points, or 0.5%, to 10,067.33, its lowest since Nov. 6. The Dow has slid 6.1% from its 15-month high of 10,725 on Jan. 19.
Despite the government's report Friday that the economy expanded at a strong 5.7% annualized rate in the fourth quarter, there are more questions now than even a few weeks ago about the sustainability of the recovery.
If those doubts grow, Wall Street could face another downdraft. And if investors grow warier of stocks, they may turn in even greater numbers to the relative safety of high-quality corporate bonds.
One unusual twist in the bond market this year is that global investors may have reason to feel more secure in bonds of mega-companies than in bonds of some foreign governments. This week, worries about Greece's dire fiscal situation also infected other Southern European countries. Investors pushed yields on Greek, Portuguese and Spanish bonds sharply higher, a sign of eroding faith in the countries' creditworthiness.
Mark Kiesel, who manages the $6.5-billion Pimco Investment Grade Corporate Bond mutual fund in Newport Beach, says he's betting that many high-quality corporate bonds will continue to attract investors looking for decent annualized yields -- in the 5% to 7% range -- and balance sheets strong enough to weather a still-rough economy.
"Corporate America," Kiesel says, "is a cash-flow machine."
That isn't any solace to the unemployed, but it offers a level of comfort that is bond investors' No. 1 priority.
Labels:
Arts,
Beat,
Books,
Government,
Literature,
Los Angeles Times,
Politics,
United States
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Murdoch forming syndicate against free web
Image via CrunchBase
"The reality is that unless a lot of people who produce news act in unison to start charging for content, then individually they will fail," said Alan D. Mutter, a former newspaper columnist and editor and consultant on new media ventures.
LATimes:
Steve Brill's Journalism Online initiative garnered attention this spring when it announced plans to create the tools to allow publishers to collect fees for digital distribution, and recently announced that more than 500 newspapers had joined. Others who have been offering competing approaches in meetings with news executives include Borders Books and Webvan co-founder Louis Borders, according to people who have attended the briefings.
The notion of charging for digital access to news, either online or on devices, has been gaining momentum ever since the Associated Press' annual meeting in San Diego in April. William Dean Singleton, chairman of the AP and chief executive of MediaNews Group Inc., railed against the "misappropriation" of news on the Internet -- a reference widely interpreted as a swipe at search giant Google Inc.
"We can no longer stand by and watch others walk off with our work under misguided legal theories," he said. "We are mad as hell, and we are not going to take it anymore."
Wall Street Journal Editor Robert Thomson added to the invective, saying Google and other news aggregators who believe that content should be free are "parasites or tech tapeworms in the intestines of the Internet."
The hot rhetoric has yielded to more cold-eyed assessment of how to make money from the digital distribution of news. News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch said in an analyst call this month that he hoped to "build significant revenues from the digital delivery." News Corp. is among the world's largest newspaper publishers, as the owner of the New York Post, the Times of London and nearly two dozen papers in Australia.
The formation of this syndicate is an overt attempt to monopolize news content across the web; it reduces competition and is in violation of antitrust laws.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)