Showing posts with label Credit rating agency. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Credit rating agency. Show all posts

Monday, March 4, 2013

Just what does a debt-laden, dysfunctional US economy have to do to get a ratings downgrade?

English: Sword of Damocles. The Sword of Damoc...
What exactly does a debt-laden, politically dysfunctional major economy have to do to get a ratings downgrade around here?

In 2011, the U.S. earned the ignominious distinction of being the first of several post-financial crisis era economies to be stripped of a triple-A credit rating. Yet since then, Washington has lurched from one budget crisis to the next, with no plan for arresting the growing federal debt burden.

In spite of those factors, the ratings agency triumvirate of Moody's, Fitch and Standard & Poor's — the only firm to actually mete out a U.S. downgrade thus far — have been strangely reluctant to pull the trigger on another ratings cut.

Even still, America's problems — including political paralysis, oceans of red ink and stunted growth — are mounting.

The refusal to cut the U.S. again is curious, given that the Sword of Damocles has already fallen on both Britain and France — the euro zone's second-largest economy, which has been downgraded on two separate occasions by two different ratings firms. Read more >>
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 6, 2012

S&P downgrades world's oldest bank to junk


Standard & Poor's on Wednesday cut its credit rating for troubled Italian bank Monte dei Paschi di Siena -- the world's oldest surviving lender -- to speculative-grade status of BB+ from BBB-.

The ratings agency said it was also placing the bank on negative outlook.

"Deteriorating trends in Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena's financial position make it unlikely that the bank would restore profitability and improve its capital and funding position in line with our previous expectations.

"The difficult economic and operating environment we anticipate in the Italian market will compound the challenges for MPS to implement successfully its business plan," the agency said in a statement.

The ratings agency said the bank's profitability could continue to be under pressure through 2013 despite its efforts to reduce costs. Read more >>

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, May 11, 2012

Moody’s Issues Capital Warning to Global Banks - May Downgrade 17 Banks

RGB version of Moody's Corporation logo, in blue.
Moody’s has warned that the tendency of global banks to avoid new capital requirement rules and load up on debt will continue to put pressure on their creditworthiness.

The credit rating agency announced it was placing 17 banks on review for a downgrade earlier this year, citing “vulnerabilities” in the companies’ vast and volatile capital markets businesses. The potential downgrades have become a talking point on Wall Street, with some bankers openly criticizing Moody’s and others privately attempting to change the agency’s mind in closed-door meetings.

But in an interview with the Financial Times, Moody’s banking analysts said the agency was updating its financial ratings to take into account the historical tendency of banks to leverage their balance sheets and arbitrage global financial rules, often to the detriment of the banks’ own health and the safety of the wider banking system. Moody’s caution could see all 17 banks downgraded when the review is finally completed, expected to happen in mid-June. More...

Friday, April 27, 2012

Spain Unemployment At Record Levels

Aljazeera.com
New figures show that Spanish unemployment has hit record levels, with nearly one quarter of the labor force unable to find work. The news was announced hours after the country's credit rating was cut two notches to "BBB " by ratings agency Standard & Poor's.

According to the new data released on Friday, unemployment levels hit 24.4 per cent at the end of March, the highest level since a statistical series began in 1996. The rate for people under 25 years of age was 52 per cent, up from 48.5 per cent in the previous quarter.

The number of unemployed people in the country has now risen to 5,639,500 people, according to the national statistics institute. This represents a rise of 365,900 from the last quarter. Total unemployment has risen 1.5 per cent, from a level of 22.9 per cent of the labour force in the final quarter of 2011. 

The institute also said that the number of households with every adult member unemployed rose by 153,400 to 1.7 million. Spain has the highest unemployment rate in the 17-member eurozone. "The figures are terrible for everyone and terrible for the government,' Jose Manuel Garcia-Margallo, the country's foreign minister, told Spanish National Radio. "Spain is in a crisis of enormous magnitude." More...

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Moody’s Now Threatening Downgrade on 5 U.S. States

Ratings agency Moody’s, which in recent weeks has warned that it will downgrade its AAA on the debt of the United States Federal Government, has now issued a new slate of threats to individual states. Today the “investor’s service” released a statement announcing that it has placed five states, Maryland, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, on review for possible downgrade from their current AAA bond ratings. The agency cites the states’ high federal employment and medicaid exposure as reasons for the review, which will affect a total $24 billion of rated debt.

“While all states are indirectly linked to the U.S. government to some degree, we have identified the five Aaa-rated states that are most vulnerable to changes in the U.S. government rating,” said Nicholas Samuels, a Vice President in Moody’s State Ratings Team. These five states have above average exposure to several sovereign risk factors that Moody’s outlined in a July 13 special comment, “Implications of a U.S. Rating Action for Aaa-Rated U.S. Municipal Credits.” The risk factors are macroeconomic sensitivity, capital markets reliance, and dependence on federal revenues, offset by financial resources available to counteract those risks.” More...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Morgan Stanley accused of conspiring with rating agencies to defraud investors

Reuters
Morgan Stanley has been sued by a Virgin Islands pension fund that accused the Wall Street bank of defrauding investors by marketing $1.2 billion (753 million pounds) of risky mortgage-related notes that it expected to fail.

The lawsuit filed December 24 in Manhattan federal court said Morgan Stanley collaborated with credit rating agencies Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's to obtain "triple-A" ratings for notes marketed in 2007 as part of a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) known as Libertas.

According to the complaint, the CDO was backed by low-quality assets, including securities issued by subprime lenders New Century Financial Corp, which quickly went bankrupt, and Option One Mortgage Corp, then owned by H&R Block.

The complaint alleged Morgan Stanley knew the CDO's assets were far riskier than the ratings suggested, but was "highly motivated to defraud investors" with pristine ratings because it was simultaneously "shorting" almost all the assets. This was a bet that their value would fall, which they did in 2008.

"Morgan Stanley was betting the entire investment it was promoting would fail," according to the complaint, which was made available on Tuesday. "The firm achieved its objective."

Alyson Barnes, a Morgan Stanley spokeswoman, declined to comment. S&P spokesman Frank Briamonte had no immediate comment. Moody's did not immediately return a call seeking comment. Moody's, a unit of Moody's, and S&P, a unit of McGraw-Hill Cos, were not named as defendants.

Many banks face lawsuits from investors who say they were misled into investing in securities they believed were safe but which were in fact tied to risky subprime mortgages.

Morgan Stanley is also a defendant in a closely watched case in the same Manhattan court that concerns whether rating agencies deserve free speech protection for their opinions.

The December 24 complaint said Morgan Stanley knew securities in the Libertas CDO were suffering a dramatic rise in delinquencies, but provided a misleading "risk factor" in a prospectus that rising delinquencies "may" hurt values in the $1 trillion residential mortgage-backed securities market.

It called this representation "analogous to Captain Smith's telling passengers of the Titanic that some ships have 'recently sunk' in the Atlantic and therefore 'our ship may sink,' without mentioning the facts that his ship struck an iceberg, had a hole in it, and was filling with water."

The lawsuit seeks class-action status, and also seeks compensatory and punitive damages, among other remedies. It was filed by Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, a law firm specializing in securities class-action lawsuits.

Morgan Stanley shares were up 22 cents at $29.51 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The case is Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands v. Morgan Stanley & Co et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-10532.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Credit Rating Agency Scam and Latest Dollar Rally

AL MARTIN via conspiracyplanet.com
The deteriorated credit ratings of sovereign debt, especially as we see it in Dubai, Greece and Ukraine, etc., has rankled global equity markets.

This has also driven money into the US Dollar and is primarily responsible for the recent rally we've seen in the Dollar.

Sovereign debt is the debt of foreign nations, Second and Third World governments, denominated in a currency other than its own, to wit US Dollars, Yen, Pounds or Euros.

This sovereign debt has been sold and is payable in a currency other than that of the issuing country.

Usually the largest amount of sovereign debt outstanding is denominated in US Dollars and Japanese Yen.

So what does the credit rating downgrade of the government debt of Greece and Dubai debt really mean?

This is a problem which everyone knows about, but which has been, until recently, successfully hidden by what I call the Wanton Bullish Shills in the media.

Credit ratings agencies, like Standard & Poors, Moody's and Fitch's, are being disingenuous at best regarding their rating system.

They are independent for-profit corporations, yet they masquerade as allegedly objective credit ratings agencies in a monopolistic role deciding what is "credit-worthy” or not.

The problem with the credit rating agencies is the inherent conflict of interests and since there are only three of them, universally recognized by the central banks, the IMF, BIS, etc., they can get away with it.

The credibility of the credit rating agencies has obviously been hurt because they dragged their feet in downgrading Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) in 2007-2008.

The credit quality of that debt was obviously deteriorating, and it also pointed out the flaws in the credit rating agencies, namely that they are paid by the very same issuers of the debt they are rating.

The principal problem is that every effort that the Democrats have made to make the ratings agencies truly independent by either making them some sort of quasi-government entity, or by creating a so-called payment pool, or even a securities transaction tax that would be paid by the industry into a common pot that would then be managed by either the FDIC or SIPC, which in turn would pay the credit rating agency.

That would remove the direct connection between the issuers of securities and the credit rating agencies who are rating them. Every effort to make them more independent has been stifled by the Republicans.

And what about the weakness in the credit ratings of the sovereign debt of Greece and Ukraine? The agencies had been warning for the last half of 2009 that problems were coming in the Greek, Hungarian, Latvian, Ukrainian, etc. economies. They had acted to downgrade the sovereign debt of these nation-states.

In fact now Moodys, Standard and Poors and Fitch's have a total of 37 nation-states on their downgrade list. These are not Third World nation states, whose credit quality is perennially "junk" status anyway. What has become more troublesome is the sharp deterioration in the credit quality of so-called Second World nation state issuers as well. This would include Spain, Iceland, Greece Hungary etc.

At the same time, the credit rating agencies have also been warning First World nation-states like the United States and Britain that they can also lose their AAA credit ratings if they do not rein in their budget deficits.

Japan has also received similar warnings since the Japanese are now running a debt to GDP ratio of about 130%.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]